50 Years Is Enough: US Network for Global Economic Justice

HOME
ABOUT US
TAKE ACTION!
THE ISSUES
THE INSTITUTIONS
ECONOMIC JUSTICE NEWS
CONFERENCES
UPDATES
RESOURCES

JOIN THE 50 YEARS LISTSERV

Search

Support 50 Years Is Enough!
Economic Justice News
Vol. 4, No. 3 October, 2001

Making the Connections Between Debt, Trade & Gender
by Pamela Sparr
International Gender and Trade Network

One of the important and exciting developments in debt advocacy work is the increased attention to international trade and investment issues. This has come in part as a result of a strategic shift in the movement towards focusing more energy on the underlying root causes of high foreign indebtedness and global poverty. It also follows greater world attention to these issues as well as the international financial institutions' (IFIs') emphasis on them. Adding a trade and investment component to debt campaigns is a potentially very fruitful development because this work has the potential to create new alliances with groups that may have had little or nothing to do with struggles around debt and structural adjustment programs (SAPs), particularly in Northern countries. For those who may be new to trade and investment issues, this article will attempt to provide some basic background on some of the links between debt, trade and investment, as well as some of the ways to extend a gender analysis into this new arena.

Connections to the Origins of the Debt Crisis

Trade and investment patterns play a central role among the systemic causes of underdevelopment and high foreign indebtedness. The early roots of current indebtedness can be traced back to colonialism and other forms of international economic domination which established unequal trading relationships and unequal patterns of international ownership of natural resources, key infrastructure and technologies. More recently, trade and investment problems contributed to the onset of the debt crisis in the 1980s.

The first contributing factor was a wild gyration in oil prices during the 1970s. While OPEC's price hikes in 1973-74 and again in 1979-80 helped oil-exporting nations, the consequences were devastating to most of the global South which relied heavily on imported oil. In order to avoid throttling their economies, many nations took out loans to maintain their oil consumption. Later, sharp declines in the price and demand for oil wrecked havoc on a number of oil-exporting nations that had themselves borrowed heavily, such as Trinidad and Tobago, Mexico, Algeria, Indonesia and Nigeria.

A second trigger for the crisis was declining earnings from exports. As countries of the global South were taking on new foreign loans, commodity prices fell. Many Southern nations desperately depended on the sales of one or a few commodities as the prime engine for their economy and the major source of foreign exchange in order to service debts. The depth of the dependence was staggering. In 1988, El Salvador, for example, earned 63% of its foreign exchange through coffee; Paraguay, 75% from cotton and soybeans; and Zambia 88% from copper. Commodity prices plunged in the 1980s. Crude oil prices fell 53% between 1980-1988, while tin fell by 57%, sugar by 64%, coffee by 30%, and cotton by 32% to name just a few examples. This meant that countries suffered tremendous economic downturns as a result, with the loss of "hard currency" (universally-accepted money like dollars, yen, and marks) threatening their ability to make scheduled loan repayments.

At the same time, Southern countries saw a worsening of their terms of trade – the purchasing power of their exports in relation to the cost of imports, particularly manufactured goods. Overall, terms of trade for primary products at the end of the 1980s were at their lowest since the Great Depression of the 1930s. In an effort to make up for falling prices and to obtain hard currency to service their debts, debtors tried to boost export volumes. The law of supply and demand then tended to push prices down further, exacerbating an already bad situation.nt>

On the investment side, net foreign direct investment plummeted in the 1980s as the debt crisis unfolded, declining by 50% just between 1982 and 1986, according to the IMF. By 1988, there was some rebound, but mostly in East Asia and a few other countries without serious debt problems. (More recently, however, we have seen how transient some of this financial capital was in East Asia with the melt-down known as the Asian Financial Crisis and its domino effects in Russia and Latin America.) The problem of weak foreign direct investment was compounded by capital flight ÷ wealthy individuals moving their money outside of their home country, usually in hard currencies, to guard against inflation or devaluation. The IMF estimated that $30 billion fled Africa between 1974 and 1985.

With investment diminishing, export revenues falling, foreign aid falling, and generally scarce internal financial resources, many countries of the global South had no alternatives for financing development other than acquiring new loans by accepting the IFIsâ structural adjustment policies.

Connections with SAPs

While the labeling and packaging of structural adjustment policies has changed somewhat over the years, the underlying goals have remained constant: to transform economies along the lines of free market models and thus to integrate them into the global economy. Foreign trade and investment play a central role in this transformation and integration process. This emphasis also benefits the IFIs and other international creditors by strengthening a governmentâs ability to continue servicing foreign debts.

The standard SAP formula assumes generally weak demand for goods in a nation, and thus relies on external demand to serve as an engine of growth and development ö at least in early phases of the SAP process. Debtor nations are thus encouraged to solicit foreign direct investment and to promote exports to generate hard currency, create employment, and stimulate their economies. This is an outward-oriented growth model. Barriers to imports (tariffs, quotas, etc.) are to be removed, so that there is a free flow of goods and services in and out of the country. The IFIs also recommend different ways of deregulating how a countryâs currency is converted and traded as another avenue for opening up the economy to international competition and market forces. The IFI rationale for pushing a single, freely-floating exchange rate is to argue that only then can prices reflect their true levels, rather than political distortions.

The final puzzle piece is to lift restrictions on foreign investment and require intellectual property protections so that capital can easily flow in and out of a nation. Foreign direct investment is often linked to trade, particularly in Southern countries. Companies often set up shop primarily to export throughout a region or to Northern markets. Foreign investors often start by negotiating licensing arrangements before they actually spend the money on a physical presence in the country. Licensing arrangements only work when a country recognizes such things as patents and trademarks (intellectual property). Goods or services are then made according to specifications and a royalty is paid to the license holder (generally a multinational corporation). Examples of companies that often operate via licensing rather than making their own direct investment are McDonaldâs and Coca-Cola. This is one reason why intellectual property issues are a hot part of trade agreements and why trade negotiators have expanded their scope to include other investment provisions in treaties.

In negotiations around regional and global free trade agreements, the objectives of Northern nations tend to dovetail with structural adjustment policies. One might argue that SAPs and the World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations, for example, are kind of a one-two political/economic punch for debtor nations, basically eliminating space for alternative development paths. SAPs also pave the way for domination by multinational corporations (MNCs) in debtor nations, largely through the emphasis on liberalization and privatization. As governments sell public enterprises or contract out services, often it is TNCs (or elite families) that win the bids or snap up the enterprise at bargain basement prices. Services and government procurement are currently two hot topics at WTO negotiations which should be of special interest to debt advocates.

Extending A Gender Analysis

As the debt crisis unfolded and we began to see the cumulative effects of several years of SAPs, it became clear that the impact of the policies and the way people responded to them varied greatly according to demographic factors such as class and gender. A significant body of academic and popular literature now exists to document how gender-based oppression of women and girls lies at the heart of the functioning of the global economy, and specifically, of SAP policies.

Much of the social impact analysis of SAPs has focused on the consequences of government budget cuts, removing subsidies, the imposition of user fees, the creation of temporary safety nets, and general economic contractions under SAPs. Often the gender analysis is centered on the fact (which the World Bank now disputes) that the poor are disproportionately female and that SAPs increased female poverty. Less research has been done on various trade- and investment- related measures in SAPs. In part, this is because it is difficult to sort out the causal factors. Can we disentangle the strands of various co-existing trade agreements, multiple relevant governmental policies, domestic and international business cycles? Researchers are just beginning to tackle this challenge.

Activists and researchers are now gathering evidence to illustrate why international trade and investment policies and trends are not gender-neutral. We are looking at how the socially-constructed roles, expectations, skills and resources that come with being male and female affect how people react to certain trade and investment policies and developments. On the flip side of the coin, we will look at how policies and institutions make certain assumptions about gender roles, and why, therefore, consequences vary according to oneâs gender. We will also look at what this means for the balance of power between males and females in the household and society.

A common starting point for any kind of gender analysis is to use the lens of three spheres of work. These three spheres are:

Reproductive: in the family/household. These activities maintain the family. They consist of domestic chores like laundry, gathering wood and water, cleaning the home, cooking, taking care of children, the sick and elderly. For some households, it also includes subsistence agricultural activities.

Reproductive: in the community. These activities help define, protect, and nourish society from the neighborhood level through to the nation state. This covers a wide range of tasks. They can range from very localized, like taking care of a neighborâs children, to very expansive, like monitoring elections for voting fraud.

Productive: in the family/household/community. These activities produce income directly (like having a job or a business) or indirectly (like supplying unpaid labor for a family business).

A comprehensive gender analysis of trade and investment yields many dimensions and complexities. Below are two examples related to SAPs, which begin to illustrate some of these dimensions:

Productive sphere effects: Many debtor nations focused their export-promotion strategies in the area of assembling manufactured goods. They saw low-wage labor as their "comparative advantage" (what they are best-positioned to provide) in international markets. They attracted foreign investors by opening export processing zones (EPZs) which provided tax holidays, infrastructure support, etc. As we know from the all-too-familiar images, this comparative advantage was built upon female labor – from the women in Indonesia making Nike shoes to the women cultivating flowers in Kenya for shipment to European supermarkets to women in Salvadoran maquiladoras sewing designer label jeans for U.S. consumers. Some countries, like Jamaica, have done the same thing for the service sector, setting up EPZs for data entry, for example. Factory owners often utilize gender-specific strategies to keep women workers in their place: mandatory "beauty contests", sexual harassment from supervisors, mandatory pregnancy testing, and sexual violence committed against women labor organizers.nt>

Reproductive sphere effects: The impact of trade and investment policy shifts go well beyond paid, formal sector employment. Policy shifts can affect which kinds of work fall into the productive and reproductive spheres, who does the work and how much time each individual within a household allocates to each. For example, consider the arrival of a cheap imported foodstuff. Previously, women made it in the home for the householdâs own consumption because it was too expensive or not available in the market. Now the family can afford to purchase it in the market. Consequently, the making of this foodstuff could shift from unpaid reproductive work to paid productive work. Might this free up some womenâs time previously spent on domestic chores? Might there be a disagreement between men in the family who want the food to be made in the "traditional way" at home and females who prefer the labor-saving market option?

While we tend to focus on the cultural hegemony questions of fast food imperialism, we also need to think about the long term effect of the arrival of Taco Bell in Mexico or McDonaldâs in China, for example, on womenâs and menâs time at home, in community and in the market. Likewise, changes in tariffs and exchange rates mandated by SAPs or trade agreements affect relative prices in an economy, and thus may shift consumption patterns, roles, and the balance of power between males and females.

The road ahead

Countries of the global North have strongly advocated expanded trade and foreign investment as the solution to the debt crisis. This approach enables them to deflect ethical considerations about declining foreign assistance and debt cancellation. It also works in favor of Northern multinational corporations that have the market clout to take great advantage of more liberalized trade and investment regimes and privatization. The approach promotes the political status quo in both the North and the South by further entrenching the neo-liberal paradigm.

As we seek to advance an agenda for global economic justice, we face the challenge of articulating what just and sustainable trade and investment policies look like, knowing that what is appropriate will vary tremendously according to national conditions. As we begin to map out the details of these visions we are challenged to make gender a central component. This challenge compels us to go even deeper in our understanding of the psychological, spiritual, physical and emotional dimensions of economic systems. It compels us to go even wider in fully integrating a gender analysis with other social and environmental concerns raised by economic programs like SAPs. Until we do so, we will not be radical or compassionate enough.

For a more extensive look at gender and trade issues, including popular

education materials, consult the IGTN website: www.genderandtrade.org.

^TOP

Home | About Us | Take Action! | The Issues | The Institutions | Economic Justice News
Conferences | Updates | Resources | Donate | Join the 50 Years Listserv

50 Years Is Enough Network - 3628 12th St NE, Washington, DC 20017 USA
Tel: 202-IMF-BANK (202-463-2265)     Email: info@50years.org