U.S. House Approves Anti-SAP Measure
Landmark Provision to End IMF/WB Mandated Fees for Health & Education Close to Becoming Law
On July 13, the U.S. House of Representatives passed
its foreign operations appropriations bill. After much debate,
the bill included nearly the full amount President Clinton requested
for the joint IMF/World Bank "debt relief" program, the
Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative.
The bill also contains a provision that represents
the first attempt by Congress to use its leverage over the IMF and
World Bank to stop some of the worst aspects of structural
adjustment
˜ in this case, the imposition of user fees for primary health and
education. The House bill still has to be reconciled
with the Senate version, so it‚s not yet law, but it has cleared
some of the most difficult hurdles.
The 50 Years Is Enough Network and other
organizations
worked closely with Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL), who introduced
the anti-user-fee amendment to the bill in the House Appropriations
Committee.
We have long objected to the HIPC program‚s
linkage
of debt relief to structural adjustment programs (SAPs). We
did not oppose the appropriation included in the legislation, but
we remain committed to working for debt cancellation that frees
countries from the shackles of IMF/World Bank demands. The
user fee provision is a modest first step in that direction. It
does not satisfy the need for a complete divorce from structural
adjustment, but it can contribute to saving and improving
lives.
It is also a significant first penetration of the seemingly-invincible
armor SAPs have been accorded by the IMF, the World Bank, and the
powerful governments that control them.
We will also continue to advocate for debt
cancellation
that requires the international financial institutions to write
off debts rather than demand that Northern countries pay them off
with their taxpayers‚ money, as is the case with the HIPC
program.
Under the provision adopted by the House,
beginning
in 2002, U.S. funding would be provided only when the heads of the
World Bank and IMF certify their institutions "will not include
user fees or service charges through Œcommunity financing,‚ Œcost
sharing,' Œcost recovery,‚ or any other mechanism for primary
education
or primary healthcare, including prevention and treatment efforts
for AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and infant, child, and maternal
well-being" in any of their programs.
User fees, charges imposed for using a health clinic
or attending school, have led to increased illness, suffering and
death when people cannot pay for health services, and decreased
school enrollments when poor families can no longer afford to send
their children to school. In a tragic example in Zambia quoted by
UNICEF, a researcher observed a 14 year boy with acute malaria
turned
away from a health clinic for want of a 33 cent registration fee.
According to the report, "within 2 hours, the boy was brought
back dead."
The Damage Done by User Fees
Recent studies have revealed some of the damage
done
by user fees imposed by IMF/World Bank structural adjustment
programs:
- In Kenya, introduction of a 33 cent fee for visits to outpatient
health centers led to a 52 percent reduction in outpatient visits.
After the fee was suspended, visits rose 41 percent.
- Introduction of user fees at rural clinics in Papua New Guinea
led to a decline of about 30 percent in attendance, and although
it subsequently increased it never returned to pre-fee levels.
Health workers also reported a reduction in completion rates
for courses of treatment.
- In Dar es Salaam, Tanzania the three public district hospitals
saw attendance drop by 53.4% between the second and third
quarters
of 1994, when user fees were introduced.
- In Nicaragua, about a quarter of primary schoolchildren have
not enrolled in primary school since charges for registration
and a monthly stipend were introduced.
- In Niger, cost recovery measures implemented as part of a
structural adjustment program between 1986 and 1988 had the
following results: 1) a sharp decline in already very low primary
school enrollment rates: these went from 17% in 1978 to 28%
in 1983 to 20% in 1988; 2) drop in utilization of preventative
care services; 3) increased exclusion of the most impoverished
from care at Niamey Hospital, where outpatients who did not
pay for care would wait an average of 24 days before seeking
care while an outpatient who did have to pay for care would
wait an average of 51 days; and 4) exemption systems that were
applied to the benefit of urban, military, and civil service
families and not for the intended beneficiaries (the most
impoverished).
- UNICEF reports that in Malawi, the elimination of modest school
fees and uniform requirements in 1994 caused primary enrollment
to increase by about 50 percent virtually overnight - from 1.9
million to 2.9 million. The main beneficiaries were
girls.
Malawi has been able to maintain near full enrollment since
that time.
|