G-7 Bids to Privatize World
One of our favorite pins says, "If you're not outraged,
you're not paying attention." This issue of Economic Justice
News is likely to prove the dangers of paying attention.
The new ActionAid report on the situation in Malawi (see page
3), where economic policies have played a large part in creating
a famine that has killed at least a thousand people, prompts
a fresh recognition of the gravity of these struggles.
Yes, we always know that the policies we discuss or protest
are responsible for deprivation and death around the world.
The immediacy of this situation and the clarity of the connections
between an economic policy dead set on privatization at all
costs on the one hand and mass fatalities on the other make
the Malawi famine one of the most vivid examples of the excesses
of the power of the IMF and World Bank.
It also serves as a humbling reminder of how much remains to
be done. For all the big protests we may plan, for all the media
"hits" we may score, we still live in a world where
it is business as usual for institutions based in Washington
to use their power to manipulate governments in Africa into
adopting policies they know will harm or even kill people. And
even when the policies result in famine, killing hundreds, even
thousands, it is still possible for those same institutions
to place all the blame on the government and organize the donors
to withhold financial assistance from a country starving to
death.
This goes on every day, sometimes less dramatically, sometimes
with fewer witnesses to see all the connections. It is considered
normal. This, perhaps, is what is meant by the phrase "the
banality of evil." Our job is to be activists who change
the definition of "normal."
In another article in this issue (see page 6), Nancy Alexander,
a frequent contributor, further exposes what is emerging as
the new development paradigm for the World Bank: now that governments
have been "structurally adjusted," and their capacity
to provide even the most basic services totally compromised,
they are told to sell off those services to the private sector.
The slogan heard so often at protests and teach-ins "Our
World Is Not for Sale" acquires extra resonance as the
World Bank decides that governments must do precisely that
sell off their countries.
This issue also reports on the inevitable failures of the IMF/World
Bank debt program (see pages 10 and 11). It is less the failure
of the program, which the 50 Years Is Enough Network has always
viewed as little more than a bribe to keep governments imposing
structural adjustment, that is news than the fact that the institutions
are acknowledging the truth, and even adding details to the
ways "HIPC" torture is applied.
Finally, we publish here a landmark statement from African civil
society, setting out broad disappointment with the ostensibly
"home-grown" development plan for Africa called the
New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD). Designed primarily
by the South African government, not only civil society has
been excluded from its formulation, but so have most of the
governments of Africa. It will nonetheless be presented at the
G7 Summit, and officially launched in South Africa in July.
Together with colleagues across Africa, we are working to expose
the process through which NEPAD was created, while trying to
preserve the idea that Africans can, and should, design their
own recovery plan. At this point, NEPAD is just a conglomeration
of policy directives issued over the years by the international
financial institutions; it has absolutely nothing new to offer.
The cynicism of this exercise in false legitimation of tired
neo-liberal policies must be overcome by the pro-active engagement
of African civil society.
|